“Slow down Six Sigma…”


Posted by: meikah | 24 March 2008 | 9:52 pm

Early this year, Erie County had put its high hopes on Six Sigma. Believing that the methodology will help them save on taxpayer’s money, county officials planned on sending employees for Six Sigma training.

The latest news however is saying that the control board and the Erie County Legislature have taken a stand to slow down on Six Sigma. According to the new on tradingmarkets.com, the budget for the Six Sigma training would run up to $912,000. But the control board’s finance committee would want to start small and see how it would go. Read the full story.

I think Six Sigma is not really for the faint-hearted. Unlike other quality methodologies, Six Sigma has to start big. Big because the first step in Six Sigma is training. And Six Sigma training is quite pricey.

I can now hear quality practitioners say that quality is free. Free in the sense that the cost of starting a quality journey cannot compensate for the benefits and savings that one reaps in the end.

So in the case of Erie County, I’m not quite sure if this is a case of being prudent or a case of politics getting in the way.

Share and Enjoy:These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • blogmarks
  • co.mments
  • del.icio.us
  • digg
  • Furl
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • scuttle
  • Spurl
  • TailRank
 Filed under: Finance, Training, Public Sector, Six Sigma | |





One Response to ““Slow down Six Sigma…””

  1. Six Sigma :Your Resource for Strategic Management - » The SixSig Roundup says :

    […] Buffalolog, Six Sigma Too “Dilbert” For The Buffalo News - this is another reaction to my earlier post on slowing down on Six Sigma. […]


Leave a Reply